Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med J Aust ; 220(6): 323-330, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38508863

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of long COVID among Western Australian adults, a highly vaccinated population whose first major exposure to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was during the 2022 Omicron wave, and to assess its impact on health service use and return to work or study. STUDY DESIGN: Follow-up survey (completed online or by telephone). SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Adult Western Australians surveyed 90 days after positive SARS-CoV-2 test results (polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen testing) during 16 July - 3 August 2022 who had consented to follow-up contact for research purposes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of respondents with long COVID (ie, reporting new or ongoing symptoms or health problems, 90 days after positive SARS-CoV-2 test result); proportion with long COVID who sought health care for long COVID-related symptoms two to three months after infection; proportion who reported not fully returning to previous work or study because of long COVID-related symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 70 876 adults with reported SARS-CoV-2 infections, 24 024 consented to contact (33.9%); after exclusions, 22 744 people were invited to complete the survey, of whom 11 697 (51.4%) provided complete responses. Our case definition for long COVID was satisfied by 2130 respondents (18.2%). The risk of long COVID was greater for women (v men: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-1.6) and for people aged 50-69 years (v 18-29 years: aRR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9) or with pre-existing health conditions (aRR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7), as well as for people who had received two or fewer COVID-19 vaccine doses (v four or more: aRR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8) or three doses (aRR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5). The symptoms most frequently reported by people with long COVID were fatigue (1504, 70.6%) and concentration difficulties (1267, 59.5%). In the month preceding the survey, 814 people had consulted general practitioners (38.2%) and 34 reported being hospitalised (1.6%) with long COVID. Of 1779 respondents with long COVID who had worked or studied before the infection, 318 reported reducing or discontinuing this activity (17.8%). CONCLUSION: Ninety days after infection with the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant, 18.2% of survey respondents reported symptoms consistent with long COVID, of whom 38.7% (7.1% of all survey respondents) sought health care for related health concerns two to three months after the acute infection.


Assuntos
População Australasiana , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome Pós-COVID-19 Aguda , Estudos Transversais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(6): 1162-1172, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37141626

RESUMO

SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Western Australia, Australia, was negligible until a wave of Omicron variant infections emerged in February 2022, when >90% of adults had been vaccinated. This unique pandemic enabled assessment of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness (VE) without potential interference from background immunity from prior infection. We matched 188,950 persons who had a positive PCR test result during February-May 2022 to negative controls by age, week of test, and other possible confounders. Overall, 3-dose VE was 42.0% against infection and 81.7% against hospitalization or death. A primary series of 2 viral-vectored vaccines followed by an mRNA booster provided significantly longer protection against infection >60 days after vaccination than a 3-dose series of mRNA vaccine. In a population free from non-vaccine-derived background immunity, vaccines against the ancestral spike protein were ≈80% effective for preventing serious outcomes from infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Adulto , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Eficácia de Vacinas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Austrália/epidemiologia
4.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 13(12): 647-655, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27602596

RESUMO

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis in hospitalized humans. Recently, C. difficile infection (CDI) has been increasingly recognized as a cause of neonatal enteritis in food animals such as pigs, resulting in stunted growth, delays in weaning, and mortality, as well as colitis in large birds such as ostriches. C. difficile is a strictly anaerobic spore-forming bacterium, which produces two toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB) as its main virulence factors. The majority of strains isolated from animals produce an additional binary toxin (C. difficile transferase) that is associated with increased virulence. C. difficile is ubiquitous in the environment and has a wide host range. This review summarizes the epidemiology, clinical presentations, risk factors, and laboratory diagnosis of CDI in animals. Increased awareness by veterinarians and animal owners of the significance of clinical disease caused by C. difficile in livestock and avians is needed. Finally, this review provides an overview on methods for controlling environmental contamination and potential therapeutics available.


Assuntos
Doenças das Aves/microbiologia , Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidade , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/veterinária , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Proteínas de Bactérias/biossíntese , Proteínas de Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Toxinas Bacterianas/biossíntese , Toxinas Bacterianas/isolamento & purificação , Doenças das Aves/diagnóstico , Doenças das Aves/fisiopatologia , Bovinos , Doenças dos Bovinos/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Bovinos/microbiologia , Doenças dos Bovinos/fisiopatologia , Clostridioides difficile/classificação , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Clostridioides difficile/metabolismo , Diarreia/etiologia , Diarreia/veterinária , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/fisiopatologia , Enterotoxinas/biossíntese , Enterotoxinas/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Gado , Tipagem Molecular/veterinária , Struthioniformes , Sus scrofa , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Suínos/microbiologia , Doenças dos Suínos/fisiopatologia , Virulência , Fatores de Virulência/biossíntese , Fatores de Virulência/isolamento & purificação
5.
Infect Dis Ther ; 5(3): 231-51, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27370914

RESUMO

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was once considered a primarily nosocomial concern. Emerging evidence from the last 20 years has highlighted a drastic shift in the known epidemiology of CDI, with disease outside of hospitals apparently occurring more frequently and causing severe disease in populations that were thought to be at low risk. This narrative review summarises potential pathways for infection outside of the hospital environment and highlights likely routes of transmission. Further, evidence is presented on potential risk factors for development of disease. Understanding the epidemiology of CDI outside of hospitals is essential to the ability to prevent and control disease in vulnerable populations.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...